Menu Top
Latest History NCERT Notes, Solutions and Extra Q & A (Class 8th to 12th)
8th 9th 10th 11th 12th

Class 12th Chapters
1. Bricks, Beads And Bones - The Harappan Civilisation 2. Kings, Farmers And Towns - Early States And Economies (C.600 Bce-600 Ce) 3. Kinship, Caste And Class - Early Societies (C. 600 Bce-600 Ce)
4. Thinkers, Beliefs And Buildings - Cultural Developments (C. 600 Bce-600 Ce) 5. Through The Eyes Of Travellers: - Perceptions Of Society (C. Tenth To Seventeenth Centuries) 6. Bhakti –Sufi Traditions: - Changes In Religious Beliefs And Devotional Texts (C. Eighth To Eighteenth Centuries)
7. An Imperial Capital: Vijayanagara - (C. Fourteenth To Sixteenth Centuries) 8. Peasants, Zamindars And The State: - Agrarian Society And The Mughal Empire (C. Sixteenth-Seventeenth Centuries) 9. Colonialism And The Countryside: - Exploring Official Archives
10. Rebels And The Raj: - 1857 Revolt And Its Representations 11. Mahatma Gandhi And The Nationalist Movement: - Civil Disobedience And Beyond 12. Framing The Constitution: - The Beginning Of A New Era



Chapter 6 Bhakti - Sufi Traditions



Introduction

As explored in Chapter 4, the period around the mid-first millennium CE saw the Indian subcontinent's landscape marked by diverse religious structures like stupas, monasteries, and temples. These buildings represent certain religious beliefs and practices. Other aspects of religious life and thought are reconstructed from textual sources, including Puranas, which were largely compiled during this time, while some practices are only dimly visible in historical records.


A new and significant type of textual source emerged during this period: compositions attributed to poet-saints. These individuals typically expressed themselves orally, using the regional languages spoken by ordinary people, making their message widely accessible. Their poetic and devotional compositions were often set to music.


These oral traditions were later compiled by disciples or followers, usually after the death of the saint. This process introduced dynamism; subsequent generations of devotees often elaborated on the original teachings, sometimes modifying or even abandoning certain ideas that became less relevant or problematic in changing political, social, or cultural environments. This evolving nature of texts poses challenges for historians attempting to reconstruct the original ideas.


Historians also utilise hagiographies – biographies of saints written by their followers or members of their religious orders. While these texts may not always be strictly factual, they are invaluable for understanding how devotees perceived the lives, significance, and miraculous abilities of these influential figures.


Together, these diverse sources (texts, hagiographies, architecture, sculpture, oral traditions) provide insights into a period of great religious dynamism and variety in the subcontinent.


A Mosaic Of Religious Beliefs And Practices

One prominent characteristic of the period between the eighth and eighteenth centuries is the increasing visibility of a wide array of deities in both sculptural art and religious texts. This indicates the continued, and in some cases expanded, worship of major gods and goddesses such as Vishnu, Shiva, and various forms of the Goddess (Devi). These deities were often conceptualised and depicted in multiple forms and manifestations.


The Integration Of Cults

Historians suggest that two interconnected processes shaped these developments:

  1. Dissemination of Brahmanical Ideas: Brahmanical traditions actively spread their ideas through the composition and compilation of Puranic texts. These were written in relatively simple Sanskrit verse, specifically intended to be accessible to women and Shudras, groups traditionally excluded from studying the Vedas.
  2. Acceptance and Reworking of Local Traditions: Simultaneously, Brahmanas incorporated and reinterpreted local beliefs and practices of diverse social groups. This involved a continuous dialogue between what sociologists call "great" (Sanskritic, Puranic) and "little" (local, regional) traditions across the subcontinent.

A striking illustration of this integration is found at Puri in Orissa. By the twelfth century, the principal deity of the region was identified as Jagannatha, interpreted as a form of Vishnu (literally, "Lord of the World") (Fig. 6.2). However, unlike conventional depictions of Vishnu, the image of Jagannatha is made of wood by local tribal specialists, reflecting indigenous artistic traditions. This represents a local deity being absorbed into the Puranic framework while maintaining its distinct, non-traditional form.

Wooden sculptures of Jagannatha, Subhadra, and Balarama from Puri

Integration also occurred within goddess cults. The widespread worship of local goddesses, often symbolised by simple stones smeared with ochre, was common. These local deities were frequently incorporated into the Puranic pantheon by identifying them as consorts of major male deities – either equated with Lakshmi (Vishnu's wife) or Parvati (Shiva's wife).

Sculpture of the Buddhist goddess Marichi

Difference And Conflict

Forms of worship associated with the goddess often included practices classified as Tantric. Tantric traditions were inclusive, open to women and men, and frequently disregarded caste and class distinctions in ritual contexts. These ideas significantly influenced both Shaivism and Buddhism, particularly in regions like the eastern, northern, and southern parts of the subcontinent (Fig. 6.3 shows a Buddhist goddess likely influenced by this process).


Over time, these diverse beliefs and practices, sometimes contradictory, eventually came to be broadly classified under the umbrella term "Hinduism." The divergence is evident when comparing early Vedic traditions (focus on Agni, Indra, Soma, ritual sacrifice) with later Puranic traditions (focus on Vishnu, Shiva, Goddess, elaborate mythologies, devotional worship). Despite these differences, the Vedas continued to be revered as authoritative texts.


Differences often led to conflicts. Those who strictly adhered to Vedic ritualism sometimes condemned practices that sought direct, unregulated contact with the divine. Conversely, practitioners of Tantric rituals often disregarded Vedic authority. Within the devotional traditions, devotees of Vishnu or Shiva often asserted the supremacy of their chosen deity, sometimes leading to tensions with followers of other gods.


Relations with other established traditions like Buddhism and Jainism were also frequently marked by tension and occasional open conflict, possibly stemming from competition for followers, resources, and royal patronage (as seen later in this chapter).


The traditions of devotion or bhakti emerged and evolved within this complex religious landscape. Devotional worship, involving intense love and adoration for a deity, had a long history. It ranged from routine temple worship to ecstatic states achieved through singing and chanting devotional compositions, particularly prominent in Vaishnava and Shaiva sects.


“Great” And “Little” Traditions

The terms "great tradition" and "little tradition" were introduced by sociologist Robert Redfield to distinguish between the formal, widespread cultural practices associated with dominant social groups (like priests and rulers) and the local, specific practices observed by peasant communities. He noted that these traditions interacted and influenced each other over time. While acknowledging this interaction, scholars sometimes use quotation marks ("great," "little") to indicate discomfort with the inherent hierarchy implied by these terms.



Poems Of Prayer Early Traditions Of Bhakti

In the evolving landscape of religious worship, poet-saints played a crucial role, becoming focal points around whom communities of devotees gathered. While Brahmanas continued to serve as intermediaries in some forms of bhakti, these new traditions often welcomed and empowered women and individuals from "lower castes," who were typically excluded from paths to liberation in the orthodox Brahmanical system. A key characteristic of bhakti traditions was their remarkable diversity in practices and expressions.


Historians often classify bhakti traditions into two main categories:


The Alvars And Nayanars Of Tamil Nadu

Some of the earliest and most influential bhakti movements originated in Tamil Nadu around the sixth century CE, led by poet-saints known as the Alvars and Nayanars. The Alvars were devotees of Vishnu, their name meaning "those immersed in devotion." The Nayanars were devotees of Shiva, their name meaning "leaders" or "devotees." These saints travelled across the region, composing and singing passionate hymns in Tamil praising their respective deities.


Attitudes Towards Caste

The Alvars and Nayanars are sometimes seen as leading a movement against the prevailing caste system and the dominance of Brahmanas, or at least attempting social reform. This view is supported by the diverse social origins of the bhaktas, who came from various backgrounds, including Brahmanas, artisans, cultivators, and even groups considered "untouchable" (Source 2 gives a quote from a Brahmana Alvar critical of birth-based status).

Source 2. The chaturvedin (Brahmana versed in the four Vedas) and the “outcaste”

This is an excerpt from a composition of an Alvar named Tondaradippodi, who was a Brahmana:

You (Vishnu) manifestly like those “servants” who express their love for your feet, though they may be born outcastes, more than the Chaturvedins who are strangers and without allegiance to your service.

Answer:

Yes, Tondaradippodi, despite being a Brahmana himself, appears to be critically opposed to the notion of caste superiority based solely on birth or Vedic learning. His statement argues that Vishnu values sincere devotion ("love for your feet") from anyone, even those born as "outcastes," more highly than mere intellectual mastery of the Vedas ("Chaturvedins") if it is devoid of genuine allegiance or devotion. This challenges the Brahmanical hierarchy where birth and Vedic knowledge determined spiritual status, advocating instead for devotion as the primary criterion for divine favour, regardless of caste.


The importance of these bhakti traditions was sometimes asserted by claiming their compositions were equivalent in significance to the Vedas. The Nalayira Divyaprabandham, a collection of Alvar compositions, was often called the Tamil Veda (Source 1 on compilations). This was a way of elevating the status of these vernacular compositions and the devotional path they represented to the level of the revered Sanskrit Vedas of the Brahmanas.


Compilations Of Devotional Literature

The devotional poems of the Alvars and Nayanars were systematically collected and organised into anthologies. By the tenth century, the compositions of the 12 Alvars were compiled into the Nalayira Divyaprabandham ("Four Thousand Sacred Compositions"). Similarly, the poems of three prominent Nayanar saints – Appar, Sambandar, and Sundarar – were collected and classified in the tenth century based on their musical modes, forming the anthology known as the Tevaram.


Women Devotees

A notable aspect of these early bhakti traditions was the presence of women poet-saints, who played significant roles despite the patriarchal societal norms. Andal, a woman Alvar, composed verses expressing intense love for Vishnu; her compositions remain popular. Karaikkal Ammaiyar, a Nayanar devotee of Shiva, pursued a path of severe asceticism to achieve her spiritual goal (Fig. 6.4 shows her image).

Bronze image of Karaikkal Ammaiyar

These women saints renounced conventional social obligations and expectations, but did not necessarily join established monastic orders or become nuns. Their lives and powerful compositions challenged patriarchal norms and traditional ideas about women's roles and capabilities, particularly regarding spiritual attainment (Source 3 contains a poem by Karaikkal Ammaiyar describing herself in stark, non-traditionally feminine terms).

Source 3. A demon?

This is an excerpt from a poem by Karaikkal Ammaiyar in which she describes herself:

The female Pey (demoness)
with . . . bulging veins,
protruding eyes, white teeth and shrunken stomach,
red haired and jutting teeth
lengthy shins extending till the ankles,
shouts and wails
while wandering in the forest.

This is the forest of Alankatu,
which is the home of our father (Shiva)
who dances … with his matted hair
thrown in all eight directions, and with cool limbs.

Answer:

Karaikkal Ammaiyar deliberately depicts herself in ways that present a stark contrast to traditional notions of feminine beauty prevailing in her society. She describes herself as a "female Pey (demoness)" with features that are conventionally seen as grotesque or frightening:

  • "bulging veins"
  • "protruding eyes"
  • "white teeth and shrunken stomach"
  • "red haired and jutting teeth"
  • "lengthy shins extending till the ankles"

These physical descriptions (emaciated body, unusual teeth, wild hair) are the opposite of the idealised portrayals of beautiful women in classical literature and art, which often emphasized delicate features, smooth skin, full figures, and graceful movements. By portraying herself as a wandering, shouting "demoness," she rejects and subverts societal expectations of female appearance, behaviour, and domesticity, aligning herself instead with the wild, ascetic, and unconventional imagery often associated with Shiva and his ganas (followers).


Relations With The State

The Tamil region saw the rise of powerful states, such as those ruled by the Pallavas and Pandyas (c. 6th-9th centuries), and later the formidable Cholas (9th-13th centuries). While Buddhism and Jainism had a presence in the region, drawing support from merchant and artisan communities, Brahmanical and bhakti traditions gained significant royal patronage, especially under the Cholas.


Interestingly, a recurring theme in Tamil bhakti hymns, particularly those of the Nayanars (Source 2 also contains a quote from a Nayanar), is strong opposition to Buddhism and Jainism. Historians suggest this hostility might stem from competition between these religious traditions for royal support and followers. The Chola rulers actively supported Brahmanical and bhakti traditions through land grants and the construction of grand temples dedicated to Vishnu and Shiva. (Fig. 6.5 shows a famous Chola bronze image of Shiva Nataraja).

Bronze sculpture of Shiva as Nataraja

The construction of magnificent Shiva temples, such as those at Chidambaram, Thanjavur, and Gangaikondacholapuram, under Chola patronage, and the creation of spectacular bronze sculptures of Shiva, were likely inspired by the devotional visions of the Nayanars. Both Nayanars and Alvars were highly revered, particularly by the Vellala (peasant) community, whose support was important for rulers.


Chola kings sought to legitimise their rule and enhance their status by associating themselves with these popular saints. They built splendid temples adorned with sculptures that reflected the saints' visions. They also actively promoted the singing of Tamil Shaiva hymns (Tevaram) in temples and took the initiative to collect and compile these hymns into a text. Inscriptional evidence indicates that the Chola ruler Parantaka I consecrated metal images of three prominent Nayanars in a Shiva temple, which were used in processions during the saints' festivals, publicly demonstrating the link between royalty, popular saints, and the divine.


Rituals And The Real World

Many bhakti saints, like Basavanna, critiqued what they saw as the hypocrisy or inconsistencies in religious rituals and practices compared to real-life behaviour. Source 4 provides a vachana by Basavanna illustrating this critique.

Source 4. Rituals and the real world

Here is a vachana composed by Basavanna:

When they see a serpent carved in stone they pour milk on it.
If a real serpent comes they say: “Kill. Kill.”
To the servant of the god who could eat if served they say: “Go away! Go away!”
But to the image of the god which cannot eat they offer dishes of food.

Answer:

Basavanna's attitude towards rituals is deeply critical and sarcastic. He views them as hypocritical, disconnected from genuine piety, and focused on form over substance and compassion. He highlights the inconsistency of venerating inanimate representations while neglecting living beings.

He attempts to convince the listener through:

  • Juxtaposition of contradictory actions: He starkly contrasts pouring milk on a stone serpent (ritual veneration) with killing a real one (fear/practical action), and offering food to an inanimate idol (ritual feeding) while shooing away a hungry human devotee ("servant of the god") who actually needs food (lack of compassion).
  • Rhetorical questions (implicit): Although not explicitly formatted as questions, the contrast forces the listener to implicitly question the logic and morality of these ritualistic behaviours. Why honour a stone serpent but kill a real one? Why feed a lifeless idol but not a hungry devotee?
  • Simple, direct language: The vachana uses straightforward examples from everyday life, making the critique easily understandable and relatable.
  • Appeal to common sense and compassion: By highlighting the illogicality and lack of charity in these actions, he appeals to the listener's sense of reason and empathy, suggesting that true devotion should extend to living beings, not just inanimate objects or abstract rituals.

In Source 2 and Source 4, both Appar and Tondaradippodi challenge aspects of the Brahmanical system. Appar questions the relevance of gotra and kula (lineage, caste), implicitly criticising birth-based status and urging refuge solely in Shiva, suggesting devotion overrides social identity. Tondaradippodi explicitly states that Vishnu prefers the devotion of outcastes over Chaturvedin Brahmanas who lack allegiance, directly criticising the Brahmanical claim to superiority based on birth and Vedic knowledge alone. Both critique the Brahmanical emphasis on birth and texts over sincere devotion, but Appar focuses on the irrelevance of lineage, while Tondaradippodi contrasts the value of devotion from different social strata compared to Brahmanical knowledge without devotion.



The Virashaiva Tradition In Karnataka

The twelfth century witnessed the rise of the Virashaiva tradition in Karnataka, led by Basavanna, a Brahmana who served as a minister. His followers were known as Virashaivas ("heroes of Shiva") or Lingayats ("wearers of the linga"). This movement remains influential in the region.


Lingayats primarily worship Shiva in the form of a linga. Men typically wear a small linga encased in silver, suspended from the left shoulder. Revered figures within the community include the jangama, or wandering monks. A core belief of the Lingayats is that upon death, a devotee is united with Shiva and is not subject to rebirth in this world. Consequently, they do not follow the Dharmashastra-prescribed practice of cremation. Instead, they ritually bury their dead.


The Lingayats posed a direct challenge to several key aspects of the Brahmanical social and religious order. They rejected the concept of caste hierarchy and the notion of "pollution" associated with certain groups. They also questioned the theory of rebirth and the cycle of karma in the same way as orthodox traditions. These stances attracted followers from those who felt marginalised by the Brahmanical system. The Lingayats also endorsed practices not approved by Dharmashastras, such as post-puberty marriage and the remarriage of widows. Insights into the Virashaiva tradition come from the vachanas (sayings), devotional poems composed in Kannada by men and women within the movement.


New Religious Developments

This period also saw two major concurrent religious developments:

  1. Many ideas from Tamil bhakti traditions, particularly Vaishnavism, were incorporated into the broader Sanskritic tradition. This culminated in the composition of the Bhagavata Purana, a highly important text in Vaishnavism.
  2. Distinct traditions of bhakti emerged in Maharashtra starting from the thirteenth century.


Religious Ferment In North India

In North India during the same period (c. 8th-18th centuries), deities like Vishnu and Shiva were worshipped, often in temples patronised by rulers. However, the intense devotional movements characterised by travelling poet-saints and vernacular hymns seen in the south (like Alvars and Nayanars) do not appear to have a strong parallel in North India until around the fourteenth century.


Historians attribute this difference partly to the political context. North India saw the rise of numerous Rajput states where Brahmanas held significant influence in both religious and administrative roles. There was less direct challenge to their authority compared to the south.


Nonetheless, other religious leaders operating outside the traditional Brahmanical framework were gaining prominence. Groups like the Naths, Jogis (Yogis), and Siddhas became influential. Many of these came from artisan backgrounds, like weavers, whose importance grew with the development of organised crafts and increased trade with Central and West Asia.


These new religious figures often questioned the authority of the Vedas and expressed their ideas in local languages, which formed the basis of modern regional languages. Despite their popularity among ordinary people, they did not typically receive support from the ruling elites.


A significant transformation occurred with the arrival of the Turks and the establishment of the Delhi Sultanate in the thirteenth century. This led to the decline of many Rajput states and diminished the traditional influence of the Brahmanas associated with them. This political shift was accompanied by changes in culture and religion, including the growth of Sufism (discussed in Section 6).



New Strands In The Fabric Islamic Traditions

The Indian subcontinent was not isolated from other regions. Contact with lands beyond the seas and mountains had existed for millennia. Arab merchants had long frequented western coastal ports, and Central Asian peoples had settled in the northwest. From the seventh century onwards, with the rise of Islam, these regions became increasingly interconnected with the broader Islamic world.


Faiths Of Rulers And Subjects

One way to understand the impact of these connections is to look at the religion of the ruling powers. In 711 CE, an Arab general, Muhammad Qasim, conquered Sind, incorporating it into the Caliphate. Later, from the thirteenth century, Turkish and Afghan rulers established the Delhi Sultanate, followed by Sultanates in the Deccan and other areas. Islam became the acknowledged religion of the rulers in many parts of the subcontinent. This continued under the Mughal Empire (16th century) and subsequent regional states.


Ideally, Muslim rulers were expected to govern according to the shari‘a, guided by the ulama (scholars of Islamic law) who interpreted it. However, governing a population where the majority were not Muslim presented complexities. The category of zimmi ("protected") was developed for non-Muslims who followed revealed scriptures (Jews, Christians) living under Muslim rule. They paid a tax called jizya in return for protection. In India, this status was extended to Hindus. Over time, rulers like the Mughals came to see themselves as emperors of all their subjects, not just Muslims.


In practice, rulers often adopted flexible policies towards non-Muslims. Many rulers granted land endowments and tax exemptions to Hindu, Jaina, Zoroastrian, Christian, and Jewish religious institutions (Source 5 shows an example of Akbar granting permission for a church, and Source 6 shows Aurangzeb expressing reverence for a Jogi). They also showed respect for non-Muslim religious leaders.

Source 5. A church in Khambat

This is an excerpt from a farman (imperial order) issued by Akbar in 1598:

Whereas it reached our eminent and holy notice that the padris (fathers) of the Holy Society of Jesus wish to build a house of prayer (church) in the city of Kambayat (Khambat, in Gujarat); therefore an exalted mandate … is being issued, … that the dignitaries of the city of Kambayat should in no case stand in their way but should allow them to build a church so that they may engage themselves in their own worship. It is necessary that the order of the Emperor should be obeyed in every way.

Answer:

Akbar anticipated opposition to his order primarily from the "dignitaries of the city of Kambayat." These would likely include local officials, potentially some Muslim community leaders, or other influential figures who might object to the construction of a Christian church in the city. By issuing an "exalted mandate" and explicitly stating that these dignitaries "should in no case stand in their way" and that "It is necessary that the order of the Emperor should be obeyed in every way," Akbar underscores the potential for resistance and uses the authority of his imperial command to preempt and prevent such opposition.

Source 6. Reverence for the Jogi

Here is an excerpt from a letter written by Aurangzeb to a Jogi in 1661-62:

The possessor of the sublime station, Shiv Murat, Guru Anand Nath Jio!

May your Reverence remain in peace and happiness ever under the protection of Sri Shiv Jio!

… A piece of cloth for the cloak and a sum of twenty five rupees which have been sent as an offering will reach (Your Reverence) … Your Reverence may write to us whenever there is any service which can be rendered by us.

Answer:

The deity worshipped by the Jogi is Shiva, as indicated by the address "Shiv Murat" and the blessing "under the protection of Sri Shiv Jio!"

The attitude of the emperor (Aurangzeb) towards the Jogi is one of respect and reverence. This is shown by:

  • Using honorific titles in the address ("The possessor of the sublime station," "Your Reverence").
  • Offering greetings and blessings.
  • Sending gifts ("A piece of cloth for the cloak and a sum of twenty five rupees") as an "offering."
  • Expressing willingness to provide "any service which can be rendered."

Despite Aurangzeb's reputation for being a strict Muslim ruler, this letter demonstrates a policy of showing respect towards non-Muslim religious figures and institutions, reflecting a degree of pragmatic flexibility in imperial administration.


Shari‘A

The shari‘a is the body of Islamic law that guides the Muslim community. It is derived primarily from the Qur’an (the holy book of Islam) and the hadis (traditions and sayings of Prophet Muhammad). As Islam spread to diverse regions with different customs, additional sources were recognised for legal interpretation: qiyas (reasoning by analogy) and ijma (consensus of the community). Thus, the shari‘a evolved as a comprehensive legal framework drawing on these various sources.


The Popular Practice Of Islam

The influence of Islam extended far beyond the ruling elites, impacting diverse social groups across the subcontinent – peasants, artisans, warriors, merchants, and others. While those who converted to Islam accepted its five fundamental "pillars" (shahada, namaz/salat, zakat, sawm, hajj), actual practices often varied due to sectarian differences (Sunni, Shi‘a) and the influence of local customs and traditions of the converts.


For example, the Khojahs, an Ismaili Shi‘a community, integrated indigenous literary forms to disseminate Islamic ideas. They composed devotional poems called ginan (from Sanskrit 'jnana') in various regional languages (Punjabi, Sindhi, Gujarati, etc.), sung in specific musical modes during prayers (Fig. 6.8 shows a Khojaki manuscript).

Khojaki manuscript page

Arab Muslim traders who settled on the Malabar coast adopted local customs and language (Malayalam). Some also adopted local social practices like matriliny (inheritance through the female line) and matrilocal residence (where the husband lives with the wife's family after marriage).


The blend of universal Islamic faith and local traditions is visible in mosque architecture. Universal features include the orientation towards Mecca (indicated by the mihrab, prayer niche, and minbar, pulpit). However, architectural styles, building materials (Figs. 6.9, 6.10), and roof designs vary widely, reflecting regional influences (Fig. 6.11 shows a wooden mosque). Local materials, climate, and architectural traditions shaped the appearance of mosques in different areas.

Mosque in Kerala with a shikhara-like roof
Brick mosque in Bangladesh
Shah Hamadan mosque in Srinagar, showing Kashmiri wooden architecture

Sufism And Tasawwuf

Sufism (known as tasawwuf in Islamic texts) emerged in early Islam as a mystical and ascetic movement. Sufis were critical of the materialism of the Caliphate and the rigid, scholastic interpretations of the Qur'an and sunna by orthodox theologians. Instead, they focused on cultivating intense devotion and love for God, following His commands and the example of Prophet Muhammad, whom they saw as the perfect human being. Sufis sought to understand religious truth through personal spiritual experience rather than solely through intellectual study of texts.


Various origins for the term 'sufism' or 'tasawwuf' have been suggested: from 'suf' (wool, referring to ascetic clothing), 'safa' (purity), or 'suffa' (the platform outside the Prophet's mosque where early followers gathered).


Names For Communities

Modern terms like "Hindu" and "Muslim" are often used to denote distinct religious communities, but their common usage and precise religious connotation developed over time. Historical Sanskrit texts and inscriptions from the 8th to 14th centuries rarely used terms like "musalman" or "Muslim." Instead, people were often identified by their region of origin (Turushka for Turks, Tajika for people from Tajikistan, Parashika for people from Persia).


Sometimes, existing terms for earlier migrant groups were applied to new arrivals; for example, Turks and Afghans were referred to as Shakas and Yavanas (terms previously used for Scythians and Greeks). A more general term used for these newcomers was mlechchha, signifying that they were outsiders who did not adhere to the norms of caste society and spoke non-Sanskritic languages. While this term could be derogatory, it did not primarily denote a distinct religious community of Muslims in opposition to Hindus. As discussed in Chapter 5, the term "Hindu" itself had diverse meanings and was not always exclusively religious.



The Growth Of Sufism

By the eleventh century, Sufism had evolved into a significant movement with its own body of literature on Quranic studies and established spiritual practices. Sufis began organising themselves institutionally around hospices known as khanqahs.


Khanqahs And Silsilas

The khanqah (Persian term for hospice) was central to Sufi life. It was controlled by a spiritual master, called a shaikh (Arabic), pir, or murshid (Persian). The shaikh would initiate disciples (murids) and appoint a successor (khalifa). Rules for spiritual conduct and interaction within the community and with visitors were established. Sufi lineages or chains, known as silsilas, began to formalise around the twelfth century in various parts of the Islamic world. The word silsila means "chain," symbolising an unbroken spiritual connection from the master back to Prophet Muhammad, through which spiritual power (barakat) and blessings were transmitted.


Initiation into a silsila involved specific rituals, including an oath of allegiance to the master, wearing a patched garment, and shaving the head. Upon the death of the shaikh, his tomb-shrine, called a dargah (Persian for court), became a centre of devotion and pilgrimage (ziyarat) for followers and others seeking blessings. The death anniversary of the shaikh, known as urs ("marriage," signifying union with God), was a particularly important occasion for ziyarat, based on the belief that saints were closer to God after death.


This practice led to the development of the cult of the shaikh, who was revered as a wali ("friend of God") (plural, auliya), believed to have acquired divine grace (barakat) and the ability to perform miracles (karamat).


Names Of Silsilas

Sufi lineages were typically named after their founding master, for example, the Qadiri order after Shaikh Abd’ul Qadir Jilani. However, some silsilas were named after their place of origin, such as the Chishti order, which was named after the town of Chisht in central Afghanistan where it originated.


The Story Of Data Ganj Bakhsh

The story of Data Ganj Bakhsh illustrates the early spread of Sufism into the subcontinent. Abu’l Hasan al Hujwiri, a Sufi from Ghazni, was brought to Lahore as a captive in the 11th century. He settled there, wrote the Kashf-ul-Mahjub to explain Sufism, and was buried in Lahore after his death in 1073. His tomb became a pilgrimage site, and he is revered as Data Ganj Bakhsh ("Giver who bestows treasures"), with his mausoleum known as Data Darbar ("Court of the Giver"). This highlights how Sufi shrines became important centres of devotion and local tradition.


Outside The Khanqah

Not all mystics adhered to the institutional structure of the khanqah. Some adopted a more radical path, scorning the hospices and living as mendicants. These mystics often practised celibacy, disregarded conventional rituals, and observed extreme asceticism. They were known by various names, including Qalandars, Madaris, Malangs, and Haidaris.


Because these groups deliberately defied the shari‘a (Islamic law), they were often referred to as be-shari‘a ("without shari'a"), in contrast to the ba-shari‘a ("with shari'a") Sufis who followed Islamic law.



The Chishtis In The Subcontinent

Among the Sufi groups that arrived in India in the late twelfth century, the Chishtis became particularly influential. Their success was due in part to their ability to adapt to the local environment and incorporate elements from existing Indian devotional traditions.


Life In The Chishti Khanqah

The khanqah served as the vibrant hub of Chishti social life. For example, the hospice of Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya (14th century) in Delhi was a complex with small rooms and a large communal hall (jama’at khana) for inmates and visitors. The Shaikh met visitors in his room on the roof. The complex included family members, attendants, and disciples, enclosed by a boundary wall. People even sought refuge there during crises like Mongol invasions.


A charitable kitchen (langar) provided food, supported by futuh (unsolicited donations). The khanqah attracted a diverse stream of people seeking spiritual guidance, healing amulets, or the Shaikh's intervention in various matters. Visitors included prominent figures like poets Amir Hasan Sijzi and Amir Khusrau, and historian Ziyauddin Barani, who documented their experiences.


Practices observed within the khanqah, such as bowing before the Shaikh, offering water, shaving initiates' heads, and some yogic exercises, indicate the assimilation of local traditions. Shaikh Nizamuddin appointed spiritual successors who established hospices elsewhere, rapidly spreading Chishti teachings and organisation. This further increased the fame of the Shaikh and drew pilgrims to his and his predecessors' shrines. (Fig. 6.12 shows a painting of Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya and Amir Khusrau).

Seventeenth-century painting of Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya and Amir Khusrau

In Fig 6.12, the artist differentiates the Shaikh from the disciple (Amir Khusrau) by portraying the Shaikh in a seated posture, possibly on a slightly elevated seat, indicating his authority and revered status. He is positioned centrally or in a more prominent space. The disciple is shown seated lower, perhaps facing the Shaikh with hands folded or in a posture of respect and humility, visually conveying the master-disciple relationship.


Chishti Devotionalism: Ziyarat And Qawwali

Ziyarat, pilgrimage to the tombs of Sufi saints, is a widespread practice across the Muslim world, offering a way to seek the saint's spiritual grace (barakat). The dargahs (shrine complexes) of the great Chishti saints in India have been centres of devotion for people of all backgrounds for centuries.


The most revered Chishti shrine is that of Khwaja Muinuddin in Ajmer, popularly known as "Gharib Nawaz" ("Comforter of the Poor"). Earliest references date to the fourteenth century. Its popularity stemmed from the Shaikh's piety, his successors' spiritual greatness, and the patronage of rulers.


Muhammad bin Tughlaq was the first Sultan to visit the shrine. Later, Sultan Ghiyasuddin Khalji of Malwa funded the initial construction of the tomb in the late fifteenth century. Located on the Delhi-Gujarat trade route, the shrine attracted many travellers. By the sixteenth century, it was highly popular, notably attracting Mughal emperor Akbar, who visited fourteen times, seeking blessings for conquests, vows, and male heirs. His visits included generous gifts, such as a large cauldron for feeding pilgrims, and funding for a mosque within the complex. This tradition of imperial visits continued (Fig. 6.13 shows Jahangir on pilgrimage to Ajmer).

Painting of Emperor Jahangir being greeted by Shaikhs on his pilgrimage to Ajmer

Jahanara, daughter of Emperor Shah Jahan, also undertook a pilgrimage to Ajmer in 1643, meticulously recording her devotional acts at Khwaja Muinuddin's dargah in her biography of the saint (Source 7).

Source 7. The pilgrimage of the Mughal princess Jahanara, 1643

The following is an excerpt from Jahanara’s biography of Shaikh Muinuddin Chishti, titled Munis al Arwah (The Confidant of Spirits):

After praising the one God … this lowly faqira (humble soul) Jahanara ... went from the capital Agra in the company of my great father (Emperor Shah Jahan) towards the pure region of incomparable Ajmer … I was committed to this idea, that every day in every station I would perform two cycles of optional prayer …

For several days ... I did not sleep on a leopard skin at night, I did not extend my feet in the direction of the blessed sanctuary of the revered saving master, and I did not turn my back towards him. I passed the days beneath the trees.

On Thursday, the fourth of the blessed month of Ramzan, I attained the happiness of pilgrimage to the illuminated and the perfumed tomb … With an hour of daylight remaining, I went to the holy sanctuary and rubbed my pale face with the dust of that threshold. From the doorway to the blessed tomb I went barefoot, kissing the ground. Having entered the dome, I went around the light-filled tomb of my master seven times … Finally, with my own hand I put the finest quality of itar on the perfumed tomb of the revered one, and having taken off the rose scarf that I had on my head, I placed it on the top of the blessed tomb ...

Answer:

Jahanara records several gestures to indicate her deep devotion to the Shaikh:

  • Referring to herself as a "lowly faqira" (humble soul) when undertaking the pilgrimage.
  • Performing optional prayers diligently during the journey.
  • Observing ascetic practices during travel ("did not sleep on a leopard skin," "passed the days beneath the trees").
  • Showing extreme reverence for the sanctuary ("did not extend my feet in the direction," "did not turn my back").
  • Entering the holy sanctuary barefoot.
  • Rubbing her face with the dust of the threshold (a sign of humility and veneration).
  • Kissing the ground from the doorway to the tomb.
  • Circumambulating the tomb seven times.
  • Applying perfume (itar) with her own hand to the tomb.
  • Placing her headscarf on top of the tomb (a symbol of respect and offering).

She suggests the dargah was a special, sacred place by describing it as a "pure region," an "incomparable Ajmer," an "illuminated and perfumed tomb," and a "light-filled tomb." These descriptions convey a sense of its sanctity, spiritual radiance, and blessed nature, distinct from ordinary places.


Music and dance are integral to ziyarat, particularly mystical chants performed by qawwals (musicians) to induce spiritual ecstasy. Sufis remember God through zikr (reciting Divine Names) or evoking His Presence through sama‘ ("audition"), the performance of mystical music. Sama‘ was central to Chishti practice and demonstrates interaction with indigenous devotional traditions (Fig. 6.14 shows a qawwali performance).

Photograph of Qawwali performance at Nizamuddin Auliya dargah

Source 7 ("The Lamp of the Entire Land") is an excerpt from Dargah Quli Khan's Muraqqa-i Dehli, describing the shrine of Nasiruddin Chiragh-i Dehli. It highlights that the shrine was considered important for the whole country, not just Delhi, attracting large crowds, particularly on Sundays and during Diwali, with both Muslims and Hindus visiting in a spirit of shared devotion and seeking cures. This indicates the widespread influence of the shrine and its appeal across religious communities.


Languages And Communication

The Chishtis integrated local languages into their practices beyond just sama‘. In Delhi, they conversed in Hindavi, the local language. Sufis like Baba Farid composed verses in local languages, some of which were included in the Guru Granth Sahib. Others wrote long poems (masnavis) using human love stories (premakhyans) as allegories for the soul's journey towards divine love. Malik Muhammad Jayasi's Padmavat is a famous example, often recited in hospices during sama‘.


In the Deccan, around Bijapur, Chishti Sufis in the 17th-18th centuries composed short poems in Dakhani (a form of Urdu). These were likely sung by women during daily chores like grinding grain (charkhanama, Source 8) and spinning, or as lullabies and wedding songs. This local adaptation was probably inspired by the Kannada vachanas of the Lingayats and Marathi abhangs of the sants of Pandharpur, facilitating the spread of Islam in the region's villages.

Source 8. Charkhanama

A song set to the rhythm of the spinning wheel:

As you take the cotton, you do zikr-i jali
As you separate the cotton you should do zikr-i qalbi
And as you spool the thread you should do zikr-i aini
Zikr should be uttered from the stomach through the chest,
And threaded through the throat.
The threads of breath should be counted one by one, oh sister.
Up to twenty four thousand.
Do this day and night,
And offer this to your pir as a gift.

Answer:

Comparing the ideas and modes of expression in this song (Charkhanama) with Jahanara's account (Source 7):

Similarities:

  • Devotional intent: Both express a focus on connecting with the divine (through zikr in the song, through prayer, reverence, and specific acts in Jahanara's account).
  • Emphasis on action: Both link devotion to specific actions – daily chores ("take the cotton," "separate," "spool") combined with spiritual practice in the song; physical acts of pilgrimage, prayer, and reverence in Jahanara's account.
  • Reference to the spiritual master (pir): Both refer to the role of the spiritual guide (offering the devotional practice as a "gift" to the pir in the song; visiting the dargah and seeking blessings of the Shaikh in Jahanara's account).

Differences:

  • Mode of Expression: The song uses simple, vernacular language ("oh sister," terms like 'jali', 'qalbi', 'aini' for types of zikr incorporated into a domestic activity) and is set to the rhythm of a household chore (spinning wheel), making it relatable to ordinary working women. Jahanara's account is a formal, written narrative (from a biography) in Persian, using more ornate and reverential language ("lowly faqira," "pure region," "illuminated and perfumed tomb") suitable for describing royal/elite piety and intended for a different audience.
  • Integration with Daily Life: The song explicitly integrates spiritual practice (zikr) into mundane daily work ("As you take the cotton, you do zikr"), suggesting devotion is part of everyday life. Jahanara's account describes a specific, dedicated event (pilgrimage) involving travel and special ritual acts, distinct from her daily routine.
  • Type of Devotion: The song focuses on the internal, repetitive remembrance of God (zikr), a core Sufi practice. Jahanara's account involves physical acts of veneration at a shrine, prayer, and expressing personal humility and gratitude.
  • Audience: The song appears intended for collective or individual singing among practitioners, particularly women, guiding their internal practice. Jahanara's account is a personal narrative written for documentation and potentially for other devotees or family members, recounting a significant spiritual journey.

Amir Khusrau, a famous poet, musician, and disciple of Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya, significantly contributed to Chishti sama‘ by introducing the qaul (Arabic for "saying"), a devotional hymn sung at the beginning or end of qawwali sessions. Qawwali performances at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya's shrine traditionally start with the qaul, often followed by Sufi poetry in a mix of Persian, Hindavi, and Urdu. Qawwali remains a vibrant part of devotional practice at Sufi shrines today.


Sufis And The State

A core principle of the Chishti tradition was austerity and detachment from political power. However, they were not entirely isolated from the state. Sufis accepted grants and donations from political elites, while Sultans provided charitable trusts (auqaf) and tax-free land (inam) for hospices.


The Chishtis preferred to distribute donations immediately to meet the needs of the khanqah and its visitors (food, clothing, shelter, sama‘), rather than accumulating wealth. This practice enhanced the moral authority of the shaikhs, attracting diverse people whose support was valued by kings. The piety, scholarship, and perceived miraculous powers of Sufis also made them popular among the masses, making their association desirable for rulers seeking legitimacy.


Rulers not only sought association but also legitimation from Sufis, who were seen as deriving authority directly from God, independent of jurists interpreting shari‘a. This was particularly important for early Turkish Sultans in Delhi, who faced a predominantly non-Muslim population and needed a basis for authority beyond strict shari‘a law insisted upon by the ulama.


Saints (auliya) were also believed to have the power to intercede with God for the welfare of ordinary people. This belief explains why kings often desired to be buried near Sufi shrines. Despite this symbiotic relationship, tensions and conflicts sometimes arose between Sultans and Sufis, particularly concerning rituals of obeisance (prostration, kissing feet) expected by both authorities. Sufi shaikhs were sometimes addressed with titles suggesting high status, like "sultan-ul-mashaikh" (Sultan amongst shaikhs) for Nizamuddin Auliya.


Other Sufi orders, like the Suhrawardis and Naqshbandis, also interacted with the state, sometimes even holding official positions, unlike the Chishtis' principle of non-involvement (Fig. 6.15 shows the dargah of Shaikh Salim Chishti within Akbar's capital, symbolising the bond with the Mughals).

Dargah of Shaikh Salim Chishti in Fatehpur Sikri

Source 9 provides an anecdote illustrating the Chishti attitude towards accepting royal gifts of land, emphasising spiritual detachment over worldly possessions.

Source 9. Declining a royal gift

This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313:

I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet … At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master … had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands? … None of … our spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”

Then he told an appropriate story: “… Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”

Answer:

This account best illustrates the principle of austerity and maintaining distance from worldly wealth and power that was a major feature of the Chishti tradition. Both Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya and Shaikh Fariduddin are depicted as declining offers of land ownership from rulers, viewing land as a worldly entanglement that their spiritual masters avoided. They accept money (which can be immediately distributed) but reject permanent ownership of land, demonstrating their commitment to non-accumulation of wealth and detachment from the political control associated with landholding.

The account tells us about the modes of communication between the Shaikh and his disciples primarily through the author's presence and description. It shows that the author (Amir Hasan Sijzi), a disciple, was present during the Shaikh's interactions with visitors and heard his pronouncements and stories. This suggests that disciples learned by being in the Shaikh's presence, observing his actions (like declining the gift), listening to his teachings (his lament about land, the story he told), and recording these events for later dissemination (compiling the malfuzat). This highlights the oral transmission within the khanqah and the disciples' role in preserving and sharing the master's words and example.



New Devotional Paths Dialogue And Dissent In Northern India

In North India, several poet-saints emerged who engaged with the changing social and religious landscape, expressing their ideas through various forms of dialogue and dissent. We focus here on three influential figures: Kabir, Baba Guru Nanak, and Mirabai.


Weaving A Divine Fabric: Kabir

Kabir (c. 14th-15th centuries) is a prominent figure known for his powerful poetry. Reconstructing his life is challenging, relying on compositions attributed to him and later hagiographies, which often contain conflicting accounts. His verses are found in three main traditions: the Kabir Bijak (preserved by the Kabirpanth), the Kabir Granthavali (associated with the Dadupanth), and the Adi Granth Sahib (Sikh scripture). These compilations were made centuries after his death, and his verses circulated widely in print by the 19th century.


Kabir's poems exist in various languages and dialects, including sant bhasha (language of the nirguna poets). Some poems are in ulatbansi ("upside-down sayings"), using inverted meanings to express the difficulty of describing the divine, such as "the lotus which blooms without flower." These verses reflect his mystical experiences.


Kabir drew upon diverse traditions to describe the Ultimate Reality. He used Islamic terms (Allah, Khuda, Hazrat, Pir) and Vedantic terms (alakh, nirakar, Brahman, Atman), as well as terms from Yogic traditions (shabda, shunya). His poetry often contains seemingly contradictory ideas. Some verses critique Hindu polytheism and idol worship using Islamic concepts like monotheism and iconoclasm. Others adapt Sufi practices like zikr (remembrance) and ishq (love) to express the Hindu practice of nam-simaran (remembering God's name) (Source 10 provides a composition by Kabir).

Source 10. The One Lord

Here is a composition attributed to Kabir:

Tell me, brother, how can there be
No one lord of the world but two?
Who led you so astray?

God is called by many names:
Names like Allah, Ram, Karim,
Keshav, Hari, and Hazrat.

Gold may be shaped into
rings and bangles.
Isn’t it gold all the same?

Distinctions are only words
we invent …

Kabir says they are both mistaken.
Neither can find the only
Ram. One kills the goat, the
other cows.

They waste their lives in
disputation.

Answer:

Kabir's argument against the distinction made between gods of different communities is based on the concept of the ultimate unity of the divine reality, despite the varied names and forms used by different religious traditions. He asks rhetorically how there can be "two" lords when there is only "one lord of the world."

His core argument is conveyed through the analogy:

  • The Gold Analogy: He compares God to "Gold" and the different names (Allah, Ram, Karim, Keshav, Hari, Hazrat) and practices (killing goat/cows) used by Hindus and Muslims to the "rings and bangles" made from gold. Just as gold remains the same whether shaped into different ornaments, the divine reality is one, even though it is called by different names and approached through different rituals.

He concludes that the distinctions are merely linguistic or conventional ("only words we invent") and that those who cling to these distinctions and engage in disputes over them miss the essential truth of the single divine reality ("Neither can find the only Ram"). He critiques the focus on external differences (like dietary practices related to sacrifice) as a waste of life compared to understanding the underlying unity.


The authorship of all verses attributed to Kabir is debated, but the vast collection signifies his ongoing influence. Kabir remains an inspiration for those who question rigid religious and social norms in their spiritual search (Fig. 6.16 depicts musicians, perhaps singing saint's compositions).

Seventeenth-century Mughal painting of roadside musicians

Kabir's ideas likely developed through interaction with Sufi and Yogic traditions in the Awadh region. His legacy was claimed by various groups, leading to debates, particularly in later hagiographies, about his religious identity (Hindu or Muslim) and his guru (some Vaishnava traditions claimed he was initiated by Ramananda). While the link to Ramananda is historically difficult to verify, it underscores Kabir's importance to subsequent generations seeking to associate with his legacy.

Nirguna bhakti: Devotion to an abstract, formless God.


Baba Guru Nanak And The Sacred Word

Baba Guru Nanak (1469-1539) was born in a Hindu merchant family in Punjab. He pursued accounting but spent much time with Sufis and bhaktas and travelled extensively. His teachings are found in his hymns and discourses, advocating nirguna bhakti.


He rejected external religious practices of both Hindus and Muslims, including sacrifices, ritual bathing, idol worship, austerities, and scriptures. For Baba Guru Nanak, the divine ("rab") was formless and genderless. He proposed a simple path to connect with God: remembering and repeating the Divine Name (nam-simaran). His ideas were expressed in hymns called shabad in Punjabi, often sung with his attendant Mardana playing the rabab.


Baba Guru Nanak organised his followers into a community and established rules for congregational worship (sangat) with collective recitation. He appointed a disciple, Angad, as his successor (guru), initiating a lineage of gurus that continued for nearly 200 years.


Although Baba Guru Nanak may not have intended to create a new religion, his followers consolidated their practices after his death, forming a distinct identity separate from Hindus and Muslims. The fifth guru, Guru Arjan, compiled Baba Guru Nanak's hymns along with those of his successors and other saints (Baba Farid, Ravidas, Kabir) into the Adi Granth Sahib. These hymns, called gurbani, are in various languages. The tenth guru, Guru Gobind Singh, added the compositions of the ninth guru, creating the Guru Granth Sahib. Guru Gobind Singh also founded the Khalsa Panth, defining its five symbols and consolidating the community as a socio-religious and military force.


Mirabai, The Devotee Princess

Mirabai (c. 15th-16th centuries) is one of the most celebrated women poet-saints in the bhakti tradition. Her life story is mainly reconstructed from her devotional songs (bhajans) transmitted orally for centuries. According to tradition, she was a Rajput princess who defied her in-laws and traditional wifely duties after being married against her will. She dedicated herself entirely to Krishna, viewing him as her divine lover (Fig. 6.17 shows a sculpture of Krishna).

Fifteenth-century stone sculpture of Krishna playing the flute

Mirabai is said to have miraculously survived attempts on her life by her in-laws. She left the palace and lived as a wandering saint, composing emotionally intense songs expressing her devotion (Source 11 includes verses attributed to her).

Source 11. Love for the Lord

This is part of a song attributed to Mirabai:

I will build a funeral pyre of sandalwood and aloe;
Light it by your own hand
When I am burned away to cinders;
Smear this ash upon your limbs.

… let flame be lost in flame.

In another verse, she sings:

What can Mewar’s ruler do to me?
If God is angry, all is lost,
But what can the Rana do?

Answer:

Mirabai's attitude towards the king (Rana of Mewar, her husband's family) is one of defiance and spiritual independence. By stating, "What can Mewar’s ruler do to me? ... But what can the Rana do?", she asserts that the temporal power of the king is insignificant compared to the power and importance of God's will. She implies that the king's anger or actions cannot harm her if she has divine protection, and that the only truly fearful outcome is incurring God's wrath. This indicates her rejection of the political and social authority of her husband's royal family, prioritising her devotion to Krishna above all worldly power or obligations.


Some traditions claim her guru was Raidas, a leather worker, highlighting her disregard for caste norms. After leaving the palace, she reportedly adopted the attire of a widow or renouncer. Although she did not found a specific sect, her songs have inspired people for centuries, particularly the poor and "low caste" communities in Gujarat and Rajasthan, who continue to sing them.



Reconstructing Histories Of Religious Traditions

Historians use a variety of sources to reconstruct the histories of religious traditions. These include material evidence like sculpture and architecture, narratives about religious leaders (hagiographies), and compositions by devotees and mystics.


As seen in previous chapters, interpreting sculpture and architecture requires understanding the context of the ideas, beliefs, and practices of the people who created and used them. Similarly, understanding textual traditions about religious beliefs is complex due to the diversity of languages and styles used. Sources range from simple vernacular vachanas to formal Persian farmans. Historians need linguistic skills and awareness of stylistic variations specific to each genre.


A wide variety of texts were produced within Sufi traditions, providing diverse sources for historical reconstruction (Source on Varieties of Sources). These include:

  1. Treatises/Manuals: Explaining Sufi thought and practice (e.g., Kashf-ul-Mahjub).
  2. Malfuzat: Collections of Sufi saints' conversations, compiled by disciples (e.g., Fawa’id-al-Fu’ad). These had didactic aims and reveal aspects of the shaikhs' teachings and interactions.
  3. Maktubat: Collections of letters from Sufi masters to disciples, reflecting spiritual guidance, life conditions, and aspirations of recipients (e.g., Maktubat-i Imam Rabbani).
  4. Tazkiras: Biographical accounts of saints, often aiming to glorify lineages, but providing valuable details despite sometimes containing fantastic elements (e.g., Siyar-ul-Auliya, Akhbar-ul-Akhyar).

These sources, some preserved, many modified, and others lost, form the basis for understanding Sufi history.


Many of these religious traditions continue today, offering historians the advantage of comparing historical accounts with contemporary practices to trace change. However, the deeply held nature of religious beliefs can sometimes lead to resistance to the idea that traditions have evolved. Historians face the challenge of studying these traditions with sensitivity while acknowledging their dynamic nature and change over time.


Shankaradeva

In the late fifteenth century, Shankaradeva emerged as a leading figure of Vaishnavism in Assam. His teachings, known as Bhagavati dharma (based on the Bhagavad Gita and Bhagavata Purana), emphasised complete devotion to Vishnu. He advocated naam kirtan (reciting the lord's names) in sat sanga (congregations of devotees). He also promoted the establishment of satra (monasteries for spiritual knowledge transmission) and naam ghar (prayer halls). These institutions and practices remain important in Assam today. His notable work is the Kirtana-ghosha.